Click it and Unblock the Notifications
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) submitted its scientific survey report on the Bhojshala-Kamal-Maula mosque complex to the Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. ASI's counsel, Himanshu Joshi, handed over the extensive report, which exceeds 2,000 pages, to the court's registry. "I have submitted the report," Joshi confirmed over a phone call with PTI.
The High Court will review the case on July 22. Previously, on July 4, the court had directed ASI to submit the complete report by July 15. This directive followed a nearly three-month-long survey of the disputed 11th-century monument, which is claimed by both Hindus and Muslims. Hindus regard Bhojshala as a temple dedicated to Vagdevi (Goddess Saraswati), while Muslims refer to it as Kamal Maula mosque.
Survey Ordered by High Court
On March 11, the High Court instructed ASI to conduct a scientific survey of the complex following an application by 'Hindu Front for Justice'. The court initially granted six weeks for completing this task. However, ASI later requested additional time to finalize their findings. The survey commenced on March 22 and concluded recently.
The ASI issued an order on April 7, 2003, regarding access to the monument after a controversy arose. According to this order, which has been effective for 21 years, Hindus are permitted to worship at Bhojshala on Tuesdays, while Muslims can offer namaz there on Fridays. This arrangement has been challenged by 'Hindu Front for Justice' in their petition.
The High Court's decision to mandate a scientific survey was aimed at resolving long-standing disputes over the site's religious significance. The findings from this comprehensive survey are expected to provide clarity and aid in making an informed judgment.
Historical Context and Controversy
Bhojshala-Kamal-Maula mosque complex has been a contentious site due to its dual religious claims. The Hindu community views it as an ancient temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati, whereas Muslims consider it a mosque named Kamal Maula. This dispute has led to legal battles and administrative orders over access and usage rights.
The ASI's role in surveying such sites is crucial for preserving India's cultural heritage and providing unbiased reports based on scientific methods. Their findings often play a significant role in judicial decisions concerning historical monuments.
The upcoming hearing on July 22 will be pivotal in determining future access and usage policies for this disputed site. Both communities await the court's decision with anticipation, hoping for a resolution that respects their religious sentiments and historical claims.
This case highlights the complexities involved in managing sites of shared cultural and religious importance in India. It underscores the need for careful consideration of historical evidence and community sentiments in resolving such disputes.
